http://www.repubblica.it/2009/03/sezioni/politica/neofascisti/lettera-pd/lettera-pd.html?rss
hard position of the Democrats and Ronchi Di Pietro and La Russa in hand with members of extreme right.
"The premier is in the House" Ministers in hand with neo-Nazi
Il Pd: "Berlusconi clarifying"
Ministers in hand with neo-Nazi Il Pd: "Berlusconi clarifying"
Minister Ronchi with the founder of "Black Heart"
ROME - The ministers Andrea Ronchi and Ignazio La Russa posing with the neo-Nazis, as written by Paul Berizzi in his book "Black Bands" and reported on the Republic, have opened another front polemic between the government and opposition.
The PD has sent a letter to Berlusconi to ask for explanations, while Antonio Di Pietro wants the premier report in Parliament.
While the Minister La Russa replied, "The picture I portrays published by a neo-fascist, but with a carabiniere.
The views expressed are harsh. Members Emanuele Fiano Misiani and Antonio, along with vice-presidents of the Group of Pd in the House, Marina Sereni Gianclaudio and Bresse, ask questions later, as written, he saw with astonishment and dismay in an article appearing on photographs of Ministers Republic La Russa and Ronchi with representatives of the world of extremism and neo-Nazi neo-fascist Italian, as well as an alleged belonged to the world of drug dealing connected to n'drangheta ".
"We would like to know - we read in the letter - if those hugs were random or fruit instead of attending a friendship and more consolidated."
"Why - read the letter - in this case, we would be faced with unacceptable friendships authoritative representatives of the government with political representatives of a world of the extreme right extraparliamentary inclinations whose neo-fascist, racist and violent were more times covered by the news of recent years. "
"It would be impossible - say from the Pd - accept that a Minister of the Republic will face photographed smiling next to the leader of an extreme right-wing circle in the magazine on the Internet showed only a year ago a shameful cover that mocking the tragedy of the Shoah and of the extermination camp of Auschwitz. "
"So for these reasons - Democrats contend the leaders - we expect denials by the parties concerned and by the President of the Council on Berlusconi persistence of old ties and intolerable that we thought finally delivered to the past."
For its part, Antonio Di Pietro also crush your hand. "How volevasi prove: the fascists and the fascists had remained.
There is a return of fascism, whose representatives, it is now proven the test, sit too long in the institutions and the reappearance of those dark periods of our history," said the leader of Idv= Italia dei Valori = Italy of Values.
'It is incredible - he explains - what is happening in our country: you erase the memory, the democratic values to rehabilitate fascism and those groups who advocate apartheid and incitement to racial hatred.
Berizzi In the book are the names and surnames of comparing, of the sponsors of these dangerous characters who occupy institutional roles throughout the peninsula.
It's good that these gentlemen are brought into the open, tell the people whether they work to affirm the values plotted by our fathers constituents or to resurrect a new fascism. Many backed the players in this anti-movement: ministers, parliamentarians, mayors, aldermen. "
"It is the same - concluded Di Pietro - who feed on the momentum of the input of black, formed from pseudopartiti, whose symbols are Celtic crosses, bundles Littoria, swastika, flags of the Third Reich. Dell'Italia dei Valori We ask the President of the Council to come to Parliament to explain what happens and we are made full light on this murky affair involving representatives of government and institutional. "
The Russian, however, the minister replied, "There's a shot of the scene, the person with which I was portrayed and which was published this morning by the Republic is not Crisafulli carabiniere but a man called Nicholas Giuliano. Now I expect apologies ".
(17 March 2009)
Gianpiero D'Alia she was concerned about who to praise Internet personalities dishonest arguing PROVENZANO, the Brigate Rosse= red brigades, Riina ... I seem to hear that instead of the Apology of Crime was committed by Minister Andrea Ronchi in hand with neo-Nazi, now let me know if you have something to say against Minister Andrea Ronchi or if shut up and will pretend that nothing has happened, hoping that Italians soon forget what happened.
I hope that the law should punish the Minister Andrea Ronchi for apology of crime, since the Nazis rake Rome and many other European cities, and not, not only wiping JEWS, but free thinkers, anarchists, COMUNISTI, Pacific, GAY .... and now they want to do with his law D'Alia?
martedì 17 marzo 2009
venerdì 13 marzo 2009
Gag to Internet: Franco Riccardo Levi
12 November 2008 Free Blogger
Mouse Gigio is worse than a spyware, a malware is a virus that insidiosissimo transforms everything it touches into a Walterloo.
His charge of Pdmenoelle, Franco "Ricardo" Levi filed with the House Committee on Culture, with some touches worthy of Pol Pot, the notorious Levi/Prodi
Also called the law "kill-blogger".
Law that goes renamed Levi/Veltroni thanks to the new terms
In essence:
-each blog is treated as an editorial product every blog that publishes the Google Adsense or banners can be answerable to the Revenue
Every blog must-subscribe to ROC (Registry of Operators of Communication)-every blog is subject to the rules on liability related to crimes in the press
-any blog that does not form part of the ROC can be denounced for the crime of "Illegal Press": two years' imprisonment and economic sanctions.
A blogger can choose to subscribe to the ROC, and the risk of one of countless criminal and civil complaints on violation of printing dating back to the Rocco code of fascism, or, alternatively, enter into hiding before being put into jail.
In short, it can hang or a head shot.
The Commission must examine the bill will start a short work on "kill-blogger".
Support from the Network will help us to make decisions.
Them not to give up never (but him?), We even.
Send your photo with the caption: "FREE BLOGGER"
Send an email to freeblogger@beppegrillo.it with:
Object: your name
Text: address of your blog
Attachment: Your photo with a sign "Free Blogger"
The photos will appear on the top bar of the blog.
Article by "Informatician Point" Analysis of Daniele Minotti
giovedì 12 marzo 2009
Gag to Internet: Gabriella Carlucci
After Levi , Cassinelli , D'Alia came even Gabriella Carlucci.
The network must be supervised by any law, with every scrap parliamentary human.
The choice of who should make the proposed law is not accidental.
Fewer know of the Internet, the better. If you do not know anything, even better.
While discussing with an informed person is an exercise as possible, do it with an idiot is not recommended.
From outside the viewer sees two idiots who raves.
Each week a new attempt to muzzle, normalized to eliminate the E Network, each week, we should rebut, explain, demonstrate, compare, condemn.
Excuse me the vulgarity, but they have broken the cock.
Italy has millions of unemployed and our employees are concerned about the gold to apply censorship to the existing information tool.
Paid by us, not with laws that are neither in heaven nor on earth.
Gabry, the less intelligent, sisters, and for this Carlucci elected in PDL, wants to forbid anyone to enter in an anonymous online content in any form.
We need to discuss with this ensemble of a few neurons and cellulitis ?
By D'Alia who wants to close the sites of authority by the Ministry of Interior for alleged crimes without a trial of the judiciary ?
By Carlucci involved the interests of the corporation ?
A structure of government with Mediaset nanotelevisiva that landslide on him day after day ?
Confalonieri of citing YouTube for 500 million euros ?
Who writes on a wall is not detectable, who writes on the Net almost always is. Your IP address is.
In most cases, the Police Post is able to identify him. These are raving.
Pisanu law's law calls for the identity card to those who connect to Wi Fi.
In the parks of New York, London, Paris, Madrid you connect to dozens of Wi Fi networks from a bench or lying on a lawn.
We are the only nation in the world that has managed to reverse the access to the Internet.
No one was capable of so much.
Neither China or Birmania.
The number of households that are connected in Italy has declined over the last year.
Thousands of municipalities does not arrive the Adsl or, if present, has the speed of a pair.
We have invested billions in the terrestrial digital, a technology dead, instead of spreading the Internet in schools and in public administration.
If these laws pass, I shall turn to Europe, to denounce the violation of civil rights.
I will not stop.
Do not stop there.
Them not to give up never (but him?).
mercoledì 11 marzo 2009
Gag to Internet: Chaos Computer Club
Chaos Computer Club: deletion of problematic content only protects the offender http://www.ccc.de/press/releases/2009/20090212/?language=en
February 12, 2009 (presse@ccc.de)
The Federal Parliament's Scientific Service confirms it has misgivings under constitutional law regarding German Federal Minister for Family Affairs and Christian Democratic Union member of the German Federal Parliment, Ursula Gertrud von der Leyen's, proposal to block objectionable internet content.
The Federal Parliament's Scientific Service has concluded in a study [1] that the bans on ISPs based on Federal Office of Criminal Investigation (BKA) lists proposed by Family Minister Mrs von der Leyen are open to question under German constitutional law.
The Chaos Computer Club (CCC) feels vindicated in its opinion [2] on internet censorship issued at the end of November 2008. However, the investigation conducted by the Federal Parliaments' Scientific Service concentrates on the legal conformity and constitutionality of the bans.
Nevertheless, the CCC remains of the opinion that actually prosecuting the culprits is getting far too little attention in the current debate.
As evidence of actual crimes on children is involved in so-called "objectionable content", this should be the actual focus of state action.
"Blocking objectionable content by bans, as proposed by the minister would mean that the actions and culprits would escape both notice and prosecution.
The state's shortcomings in prosecuting these offences are nevertheless not resolved by blocking viewing of the crimes", CCC spokesman Andy Müller-Maguhn said about Mrs von der Leyen's proposal.
A statistical analysis of filter lists [3] from Switzerland, Denmark, Finland and Sweden revealed that more than 96% of the servers they banned are located in western countries, particularly the USA, Australia, Canada and the Netherlands.
It is quite implausible that these servers and their operators cannot be shut down and prosecuted by means of international cooperation by law enforcement authorities.
There is clearly a lack of political will here to establish appropriate priorities and to make the necessary resources available.
The reasoning that bars to access must be implemented since the culprits are not being apprehended does not even match the facts.
It has been known for a long time that the any 'barriers' put up can be
evaded by the simplest means.
"As servers only appear on the BKA blacklists if they are known to investigators, there is no excuse for law enforcement agencies not taking action against the operators. However, appropriate efforts at international cooperation and effective prosecution are not even being looked at as policies", said CCC spokesman Andy Müller-Maguhn.
So instead of taking effective and productive measures and getting to the root of the trouble, an attempt is being made to pressurise ISPs into creating a censorship infrastructure.
Once the technology for content censorship is installed, it will doubtless be used for other interests, such as those of the music industry.
A barrier that opens the way to a state-censored internet will be crossed here for no objective reasons.
Examples from the Scandinavian countries so highly praised by Mrs von der Leyen show that blocking filters are already being misused to censor discussion of the filters themselves.
[4] In this instance objective critics of blocking systems have been defamed
en bloc as friends of child pornography to prevent an objective discussion.
Similar events can already be observed in the debate in Germany.
Instead of back-door internet censorship, the Chaos Computer Club
consequently demands that effective measures are finally taken against
child sexual abuse and its associated trade.
Summing up the CCC's concerns, CCC spokesman Müller-Maguhn said: "The
internet reflects real social problems that must be resolved and not swept under the carpet.
The legal bases for prosecuting offenders are already in place; what is lacking is a cohesive course of action, including the required provision of staff for law enforcement authorities.
The fact they are trying to give the appearance of solving the problem by banning and blocking objectionable content is pure populism.
The public is being mislead with the aim of establishing a censorship infrastructure that is unfit for a democracy".
http://www.ccc.de/press/releases/2009/20090212/?language=en
February 12, 2009 (presse@ccc.de)
The Federal Parliament's Scientific Service confirms it has misgivings under constitutional law regarding German Federal Minister for Family Affairs and Christian Democratic Union member of the German Federal Parliment, Ursula Gertrud von der Leyen's, proposal to block objectionable internet content.
The Federal Parliament's Scientific Service has concluded in a study [1] that the bans on ISPs based on Federal Office of Criminal Investigation (BKA) lists proposed by Family Minister Mrs von der Leyen are open to question under German constitutional law.
The Chaos Computer Club (CCC) feels vindicated in its opinion [2] on internet censorship issued at the end of November 2008. However, the investigation conducted by the Federal Parliaments' Scientific Service concentrates on the legal conformity and constitutionality of the bans.
Nevertheless, the CCC remains of the opinion that actually prosecuting the culprits is getting far too little attention in the current debate.
As evidence of actual crimes on children is involved in so-called "objectionable content", this should be the actual focus of state action.
"Blocking objectionable content by bans, as proposed by the minister would mean that the actions and culprits would escape both notice and prosecution.
The state's shortcomings in prosecuting these offences are nevertheless not resolved by blocking viewing of the crimes", CCC spokesman Andy Müller-Maguhn said about Mrs von der Leyen's proposal.
A statistical analysis of filter lists [3] from Switzerland, Denmark, Finland and Sweden revealed that more than 96% of the servers they banned are located in western countries, particularly the USA, Australia, Canada and the Netherlands.
It is quite implausible that these servers and their operators cannot be shut down and prosecuted by means of international cooperation by law enforcement authorities.
There is clearly a lack of political will here to establish appropriate priorities and to make the necessary resources available.
The reasoning that bars to access must be implemented since the culprits are not being apprehended does not even match the facts.
It has been known for a long time that the any 'barriers' put up can be
evaded by the simplest means.
"As servers only appear on the BKA blacklists if they are known to investigators, there is no excuse for law enforcement agencies not taking action against the operators. However, appropriate efforts at international cooperation and effective prosecution are not even being looked at as policies", said CCC spokesman Andy Müller-Maguhn.
So instead of taking effective and productive measures and getting to the root of the trouble, an attempt is being made to pressurise ISPs into creating a censorship infrastructure.
Once the technology for content censorship is installed, it will doubtless be used for other interests, such as those of the music industry.
A barrier that opens the way to a state-censored internet will be crossed here for no objective reasons.
Examples from the Scandinavian countries so highly praised by Mrs von der Leyen show that blocking filters are already being misused to censor discussion of the filters themselves.
[4] In this instance objective critics of blocking systems have been defamed
en bloc as friends of child pornography to prevent an objective discussion.
Similar events can already be observed in the debate in Germany.
Instead of back-door internet censorship, the Chaos Computer Club
consequently demands that effective measures are finally taken against
child sexual abuse and its associated trade.
Summing up the CCC's concerns, CCC spokesman Müller-Maguhn said: "The
internet reflects real social problems that must be resolved and not swept under the carpet.
The legal bases for prosecuting offenders are already in place; what is lacking is a cohesive course of action, including the required provision of staff for law enforcement authorities.
The fact they are trying to give the appearance of solving the problem by banning and blocking objectionable content is pure populism.
The public is being mislead with the aim of establishing a censorship infrastructure that is unfit for a democracy".
http://www.ccc.de/press/
venerdì 6 marzo 2009
Gag to Internet: politicians and dishonests
Not long ago I wrote to the European Union with the hope of having an answer.
I am very sorry for not being heard as a citizen who is entitled to express their free thought, without someone decides what can be said or not said on the Internet.
Dall'intervista of Alexander the Gilioli sen. D'Alia published on "L'Espresso http://gilioli.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2009/02/10/%C2%ABfacebook-e-youtube-o-obbediscono-o-li-oscuro%C2%BA
Gilioli: I wanted to talk about this amendment: First, explain the purpose and usefulness.
D'Alia: The amendment to Article 50 introduces a security package, which allows the Minister of the Interior, upon notice of the court which is a crime of incitement to criminal defense or offense, gives the Ministry of Interior the power to require that providers of Internet connectivity to use the tools to filter those sites or social network that contain, say, statements and anything else related to these cases of crime.
That is, it's a standard that is used to begin to intervene in the regulation of the Internet and this comes mainly from events that focused on Facebook, the appearance on the social network for groups to inneggianti Riina, Provenzano, the Red Brigades and so on.
And since there is no tool in making an immediate action if it deems such a course of crime, that is, if the judiciary is investigating, the Minister of Interior is involved with a purely precautionary in nature that serve to ensure that there is a proliferation of these sites or illegal these events on the network.
Of course, all this takes place with the possibility of recourse to the court by interested parties, but through a kind of contradictory with the operators of sites to which a notice is served to obscure, or delete those parts which are contrary to the positions mentioned.
A. Gilioli: But, Senator, let me interrupt you.
This claim is made that it is this: I read that right its amendment, no one speaks to cancel the parties, but to obscure the site.
Then they say: if there is a group on facebook that calls for Provenzano rather than other things, the effect of his amendment would delete the page, but obscure the entire site.
D'Alia: But excuse me: If the site does not pay to remove these subjects from the site, it is right that the site is obscured.
The Ministry warns the operator, the operator then has two options: either comply and then delete the site group, or do not comply.
If you do not comply it is an accomplice of those who praise Riina and Provenzano is therefore right that is obscured.
A. Gilioli: In YouTube, for example, there are several videos that may fall, perhaps, within the type that you expressed.
If YouTube does not delete the video is obscured the YouTube?
D'Alia: I will, of course.
A. Gilioli: Yet another case ...
D'Alia: Let me give an example: if one comes out on YouTube video, as it happened, and also there have been several controversies, in which four boys beat their contemporary disabile however, in this case we represent the presence of a crime is not that there is an apology: there is the direct or playing a film in which it is committing a criminal offense is right that a site is maintained?
I think not.
A. Gilioli: Another case: there is a debate online, on sites in the forums.
Among users of the forum may be that there is also that insults or threatens you.
She believes this is a type ...
D'Alia: If someone threatens me, the threat in reality or on the internet is always a crime.
A. Gilioli: Here are another kind: I am allegedly the author of a blog.
Within some of my blog, one of the commentators on my blog, I insult, threat.
I who am the blog master and then I think it is fair to leave my blog open to each entry, including those that threaten me and insult me, do not I hide these items.
Even in this case falls within the type?
D'Alia: Look, cover all those assumptions that are provided under the Criminal Code of the crimes of murder or incitement to disobey the law.
The crimes of apology of crime, which are provided by the Criminal Code or other provisions.
These are all assumptions that are brought to case illegal, who are already punished in the criminal code and that thus need to be sanctioned in all their manifestations.
It is not that changes if I make a stencils to say that Riina ...
A. Gilioli: Excuse me Senator, are we talking about the comments to a blog ...
D'Alia: Well, the comments to a blog is not that different: if in a comment to a blog I would say that the Red Brigades have done well to kill Moro, this is called apology of crime.
What I do on the blog, with a telegram, a card, with a press release does not change:
Always it comes to crime and should be pursued, and should be pursued if the one who makes it complicit publishing these disgraceful, including whether it is an operator of the Internet just be clear.
I think in this way.
A. Gilioli: Senta senator: you are a frequenter of the network?
D'Alia: Yes
A. Gilioli: On facebook there's going?
D'Alia: No, I go on facebook indigna just because I see on that site that you censurino mothers who breastfeed their children because it is considered an aesthetically offensive, unsightly, and then allow the various groups, such as "Homage to Cutolo, who is a relative of pentiti infamous confidants and please do not subscribe to this site dedicated to Cutolo.
I do not go there because this site that censure the mothers, as also correctly says Article 21, and allows these disgraceful is an unworthy, from my point of view.
With all due respect to those who enter.
A. Gilioli: Are you aware that if you close in YouTube and Facebook are Burma worse?
D'Alia: Look, I do not have to close or Facebook or YouTube: I am because Facebook and YouTube respect the victims of the Mafia, terrorism and rapes.
A. Gilioli: And if you do not comply ?
D'Alia: You do not comply can not have respect for the rule.
A. Gilioli: So are closed.
D'Alia: And is evident.
The government is preparing to gag Internet
With the safety package approved by the Senate, Berlusconi gives the Minister of Interior the power to close down Internet sites, filtering and fined heavily.
[05-02-2009]http://www.zeusnews.com/index.php3?ar=stampa&cod=9362
Berlusconi had proposed giving a constitution to the Internet world, certainly if the model is what is introducing in Italy is far ahead from the chills.
The safety package just approved by the Senate (still must return to the House) in fact provides that the Ministry may order the dimming of the websites on which commits the offense of apology or instigation to commit crimes. The ministry will request that there be a virus adapted.
The internet provider "disobedient" to pay a penalty from 50 thousand to 250 thousand euros.
In the text of ddl states that: "In case of proven or incitement apology, the Minister has with its interruption of the decree stated, ordering service providers to network connectivity to the Internet to use the appropriate tools filtering required for this purpose by applying financial penalties for breach. "
In practice the government will retain a power that only in totalitarian countries belonging to the police, while in democratic countries can be exercised only by the court and never by the government by administrative means.
The measure was included at the last minute thanks to an amendment by Senator Gianpiero D'Alia (UDC), which takes inspiration from the latest controversy about Facebook Groups in favor of the rapes or the Mafia.
Senator D'Alia commented: "This will give substance to our efforts to clean up the network, and in particular the social network Facebook kinds of emulates Riina, Provenzano, the Br, the rapists of Guidonia and all the other bad examples so far where it was given space irresponsibly. "
Muzzle the Internet, here's what the real purpose.
Perhaps we are not yet to Nazism against which Di Pietro shouts, but certainly fascism began in Italy in a way very similar.
Facebook responds to government censorship Italian
The response of the social network to the recent law that allows our government to block any site at will. [12-02-2009]
http://www.zeusnews.com/index.php3?ar=stampa&cod=9428
Senator Gianpiero D'Alia, "you said that those who praise people like Provenzano, Riina, the Red Brigades", it is guilty of Apology of Crime, then I thought of all those characters that are right in what Fini, Alemanno, Silvio Berlusconi, Santanchè, Storace, Mussolini and those of Forza Nuova.
All these are then guilty of Apology to Reato and thus calling for chased away from Parliament, and put in handcuffs for having praise to the Holocaust, squares or Italian armed with sticks and truncheons, seeking confrontation with the police and Silvio Berlusconi that praise by saying that Mangano was a hero.
This is a small part of those who so wish to enforce the laws, but are the first to have violated.
Block access to Facebook for all the fault of the presence of certain groups is questionable how to close an entire rail network due to some offensive graffiti in a single station: Facebook responds well to the proposal advanced by the government censors Italian.
The problem was born following the discovery of some groups to criminals praising recognized by Riina to the rapists of Guidonia.
The solution?
Put the gag to the Internet regardless of how many use the same instrument for more than lawful purposes.
ISPs, of course, should have been the instrument of censorship, by applying the filters in accordance with the Ministry of Interior, otherwise a fine salt.
It seems that those who sit for Facebook to Rome is the repository - at least for now, until the next fashion - of every wickedness.
Someone should let them see, that the social network is complex because the real world, and that while 433 fans Provenzano there are 369.463 of Falcone and Borsellino.
Senator Gianpiero D'Alia has also sought to correct the roll: not all Facebook is blocked, only the pages involved.
One wonders if the Senator has ever asked what the technical difficulties it would entail for the providers, who could be forced to admit that he can not do as requested.
More time passes, the more it seems that our rulers do not know what the Internet is not how it works.
The problem was born following the discovery of some groups to criminals praising recognized by Riina to the rapists of Guidonia.
The solution?
Put the gag to the Internet regardless of how many use the same instrument for more than lawful purposes.
ISPs, of course, should have been the instrument of censorship, by applying the filters in accordance with the Ministry of Interior, otherwise a fine salt.
It seems that those who sit for Facebook to Rome is the repository - at least for now, until the next fashion - of every wickedness.
Someone should let them see, that the social network is complex because the real world, and that while 433 fans Provenzano there are 369.463 of Falcone and Borsellino.
Senator Gianpiero D'Alia has also sought to correct the roll: not all Facebook is blocked, only the pages involved.
One wonders if the Senator has ever asked what the technical difficulties it would entail for the providers, who could be forced to admit that he can not do as requested.
More time passes, the more it seems that our rulers do not know what the Internet is not how it works.
Evidently Rome is not have nothing better to do than try to muzzle the Internet, or if it appears too difficult for obvious technical issues, at least make sure that whoever is found and darkened as desired.
The last, brilliant, tough and smoke - and therefore dangerous - idea is found in the draft law proposed in 2195 by Gabriella Carlucci with the noble aim of "ensuring the protection of legality on the Internet."
The official publication of the text has yet to happen but some parts - especially the second article - are already circulating and receiving considerable attention.
The first paragraph seems explicit: "It is prohibited to make or facilitate entry into the content network in any form (text, sound, audiovisual and computer science, including databases) in an anonymous".
Well, so everything should sign with name and surname? Need a picture? Are banned nickname? Or already anonymity does not exist in practice - because the providers are able to trace with some certainty, from the information contained in the logs (IP addresses, schedules and so on), the authors of certain content - and therefore This paragraph is unnecessary?
For the operators of anonymisation, as Tor or Freenet, it is perhaps ready to take your bags, since they could facilitate the release of content into anonymous ?
The beginning, in short, is bad. The paragraph seems clear, but in reality leaves wide room for interpretation and thus the ability to bend the law at will.
The second paragraph borders on delirium of omnipotence, even going to threaten those who are outside of Italy: "The subject that, even in competition with other operators on the Italian territory, or unidentified or identified, make possible the conduct referred to 1.
We are not responsible - together with those who made the anonymous publications - each and every offense, give or administrative violation caused damage to third parties or the State. "
Who are these individuals is unclear.
Perhaps those who already accept interventions without prior identification - but retain the right IP address - or even those who give pain to register addresses in contravention of, inter alia, to a European standard is not yet in force, or perhaps even the poor managers tor, targeted by the right and missing.
Nor, on the other hand, the providers are equipped to identify each individual act of each individual user in respect of each service used, nor is it clear whether, with this DDL, Ip is sufficient to identify the "guilty".
Since the worst there is no limit, this is the third paragraph, the longer the preceding and following, but we understand only too quickly by reading the first line: "As regards the crimes of defamation apply, without exception, all the rules on the Press. "
Dangerous: the blog read by three friends and ten casual visitors become exactly equal to the Corriere della Sera, the site with pictures of the family is equivalent to the Repubblica, who ignites the forum dell'Olimpo Informatico - as well as evoking a moderator - in danger a good complaint for libel, because everything is "publication", where the wretch ddl collections approving people.
What beautiful, however !
Every webmaster, even manage the website of local polisportiva, will be called Chief. Perhaps it would be agreed to seek advice to English courts, which deal with the case of Royd Tolkien. http://www.zeusnews.com/index.php3?ar=stampa&cod=9262
Certainly commendable that Mrs Carlucci - or for you who made the proposal - both built in doubt, always all'inteno paragraph 3: "If insurmountable technical problems make it impossible to implement certain measures, particularly with respect to right of reply, the Committee for the protection of legality on the Internet (as stated in article 3 of this Act) may be assigned by the competent magistrate of a case such measures could be implemented, however, to give effect to the provisions of the rules force ".
The doubt is easily translates this way: if someone notices that we are ordering the impossible, the court will deal invent something plausible to be done to the Committee for the protection of legality (a name that just makes you feel as urticaria), now that the existing criminal defamation provides precise consequences.
Finally, the fourth paragraph: "In relation to violations relating to standards for the protection of copyright, related rights and Conditional Access Systems to apply without exception to the rules provided by Law 633/41 and subsequent amendments."
That is, in practice the ddl in 2195 is saying that any breaches of copyright, the law on copyright violations. Useless, but unbreakable.
The good thing is that if there was suspicion that Mrs Carlucci - and most of his colleagues - to legislate things that do not know, now it has fallen, turning into certainty.
Understanding the complexity of the network and the number of participants requires effort and a little 'of humility, while the Internet bubble as "wild no man's land" because of criminal-minded groups on Facebook (ignoring everything else) is much simpler and perhaps also to hear more good.
In fact, perhaps, there was a good idea, at least initially, the proposal to abolish anonymity may imply the idea that individual users are to be held accountable for their actions and not - for example - the providers, as from time to time you want to believe. Sin that has been quickly submerged by unspeakable ddl proposals in 2195
The last, brilliant, tough and smoke - and therefore dangerous - idea is found in the draft law proposed in 2195 by Gabriella Carlucci with the noble aim of "ensuring the protection of legality on the Internet."
The official publication of the text has yet to happen but some parts - especially the second article - are already circulating and receiving considerable attention.
The first paragraph seems explicit: "It is prohibited to make or facilitate entry into the content network in any form (text, sound, audiovisual and computer science, including databases) in an anonymous".
Well, so everything should sign with name and surname? Need a picture? Are banned nickname? Or already anonymity does not exist in practice - because the providers are able to trace with some certainty, from the information contained in the logs (IP addresses, schedules and so on), the authors of certain content - and therefore This paragraph is unnecessary?
For the operators of anonymisation, as Tor or Freenet, it is perhaps ready to take your bags, since they could facilitate the release of content into anonymous ?
The beginning, in short, is bad. The paragraph seems clear, but in reality leaves wide room for interpretation and thus the ability to bend the law at will.
The second paragraph borders on delirium of omnipotence, even going to threaten those who are outside of Italy: "The subject that, even in competition with other operators on the Italian territory, or unidentified or identified, make possible the conduct referred to 1.
We are not responsible - together with those who made the anonymous publications - each and every offense, give or administrative violation caused damage to third parties or the State. "
Who are these individuals is unclear.
Perhaps those who already accept interventions without prior identification - but retain the right IP address - or even those who give pain to register addresses in contravention of, inter alia, to a European standard is not yet in force, or perhaps even the poor managers tor, targeted by the right and missing.
Nor, on the other hand, the providers are equipped to identify each individual act of each individual user in respect of each service used, nor is it clear whether, with this DDL, Ip is sufficient to identify the "guilty".
Since the worst there is no limit, this is the third paragraph, the longer the preceding and following, but we understand only too quickly by reading the first line: "As regards the crimes of defamation apply, without exception, all the rules on the Press. "
Dangerous: the blog read by three friends and ten casual visitors become exactly equal to the Corriere della Sera, the site with pictures of the family is equivalent to the Repubblica, who ignites the forum dell'Olimpo Informatico - as well as evoking a moderator - in danger a good complaint for libel, because everything is "publication", where the wretch ddl collections approving people.
What beautiful, however !
Every webmaster, even manage the website of local polisportiva, will be called Chief. Perhaps it would be agreed to seek advice to English courts, which deal with the case of Royd Tolkien. http://www.zeusnews.com/index.php3?ar=stampa&cod=9262
Certainly commendable that Mrs Carlucci - or for you who made the proposal - both built in doubt, always all'inteno paragraph 3: "If insurmountable technical problems make it impossible to implement certain measures, particularly with respect to right of reply, the Committee for the protection of legality on the Internet (as stated in article 3 of this Act) may be assigned by the competent magistrate of a case such measures could be implemented, however, to give effect to the provisions of the rules force ".
The doubt is easily translates this way: if someone notices that we are ordering the impossible, the court will deal invent something plausible to be done to the Committee for the protection of legality (a name that just makes you feel as urticaria), now that the existing criminal defamation provides precise consequences.
Finally, the fourth paragraph: "In relation to violations relating to standards for the protection of copyright, related rights and Conditional Access Systems to apply without exception to the rules provided by Law 633/41 and subsequent amendments."
That is, in practice the ddl in 2195 is saying that any breaches of copyright, the law on copyright violations. Useless, but unbreakable.
The good thing is that if there was suspicion that Mrs Carlucci - and most of his colleagues - to legislate things that do not know, now it has fallen, turning into certainty.
Understanding the complexity of the network and the number of participants requires effort and a little 'of humility, while the Internet bubble as "wild no man's land" because of criminal-minded groups on Facebook (ignoring everything else) is much simpler and perhaps also to hear more good.
In fact, perhaps, there was a good idea, at least initially, the proposal to abolish anonymity may imply the idea that individual users are to be held accountable for their actions and not - for example - the providers, as from time to time you want to believe. Sin that has been quickly submerged by unspeakable ddl proposals in 2195
Senator Gianpiero D'Alia, "you said that those who praise people like Provenzano, Riina, the Red Brigades", it is guilty of Apology of Crime, then I thought of all those characters that are right in what Fini, Alemanno, Silvio Berlusconi, Santanchè, Storace, Mussolini and those of Forza Nuova.
All these are then guilty of Apology to Reato and thus calling for chased away from Parliament, and put in handcuffs for having praise to the Holocaust, squares or Italian armed with sticks and truncheons, seeking confrontation with the police and Silvio Berlusconi that praise by saying that Mangano was a hero.
This is a small part of those who so wish to enforce the laws, but are the first to have violated.
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)